READERS

5 Aug 2013

The £10 top-up #Twitter request & proving my pessimistic self correct

Here is my view of some of #Twitters #subs and #slaves, and some of those that #follow Me. They are 'substandard'! Associated with this bunch of substandard #submissive are the words "i want." A true #submissive offer their services to #Dommes with respect, without wanting anything in return. The act of giving a gift, serving is honour enough. But substandards pretend - pretend to wish to serve, pretend to wish to give - but they always want something first or in return. They place themselves above the D/s relationship - they are orgasm seekers, topping from the bottom.

Submissive vs. Substandard



I cannot describe how annoying it is to find so few truly submissive individuals in The Scene.  I believe that largely due to the dummes ruining the concept of Dominance, people have come to associate the term "submissive" with the phrase, "i want".  As a submissive, these two words should never come out of your mouth when addressing a Dominant.  That behavior is what has been fostered by hoochies-with-whips accommodating kink.  Dominant/submissive ("D/s") relationships are about negotiation on a completely different level.  your goal as a submissive is to serve; not to be serviced.

Although I have presented this article with a focus on the male submissive, the same concepts apply to females who present themselves as submissive.  My use of the Feminine when discussing the Dominant includes Dominant males.

I make it clear that in no uncertain terms do I present that professional submissives are "substandards", although far too many are exploiting the concept and the responsibility of being a submissive.  And far too many hookers are calling themselves submissive.

"Domme vs. dumme"


There is a terrible injustice that has happened to the world of the true Dominatrix.  Those of Us who understand the Art of BDSM and the D/s relationship have been confused with the wave of barely teenage, hoochies with whips and without a clue.  I present the following to clarify the difference between REAL Dommes and what I call “dummes” ~ those who are too limited to acquire proper technique, cultivate submissive training, and educate themselves to the nuances of The Scene.

Although I have presented this article with a focus on the Feminine, the same concepts apply to "Masters" and "musters", (those who attempt to "muster up" a façade of Dominance) but with a testosteronic (yes, I took the liberty to create that word) mania.

I make it clear that in no uncertain terms do I present that Professional Dominatrices are "dummes", although far too many are corroding the concept and the honor of being a Domme.

I'm sure I will ruffle quite a few feathers with My views and experiences.  However,  it would be advantageous to read "submissive vs. substandard" for a better understanding and self-realization.

2 Aug 2013

We Need Education on Porn, Not Censorship

Having discussed David Cameron's need to censor the internet with regards to 'porn', (My preveous article here)  it seems the debate is still strong and the subject is not going to be forgotten quickly.

Below are a few more articles on the subject (although I find Fiona Elvines viewpoint in the 3rd article "Should accessing 'rape pornography' be restricted by law? The guardian" quite uneducated and personally offensive )

Practice makes perfect

Resulting form the lack of effectiveness in work while wearing shackles, I did promise Mistress to practice more at home when I have time an...